Current challenges in the enforcement of intellectual property rights in Ukraine are gaining particular relevance as the country advances on its path toward European integration and were the focus of a strategic meeting involving representatives of the Ukrainian National Office for Intellectual Property and Innovations (UANIPIO/IP Office), the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine, and the Prosecutor`s Training Center of Ukraine.
The participants outlined several key challenges:
Addressing these challenges is essential not only for strengthening the rights-protection infrastructure in the IP field but also for bringing Ukraine closer to the EU standards. This was emphasized by the Head of the IP Office, Olena Orliuk:
“Intellectual property is a key intangible asset that underpins the economic resilience and development of the state. It reinforces the trust of foreign investors and facilitates the growth of Ukrainian business, science, and the creative industries.
However, effective IP rights enforcement requires coordinated efforts at the interdepartmental level. The IP Office’s Intellectual Property Rights Infringement Monitoring Center is already playing an important role in the fight against counterfeiting, as it brings together key stakeholders for effective communication. We are building partnerships with law enforcement, customs authorities, businesses, and the civil sector to jointly develop effective tools to address IP violations”.
The IP Office was also represented at the meeting by:
Oleksii Boniuk, Head of Criminal Law Policies and Investments Protection Department, Prosecutor General`s Office, stressed the importance of experience-sharing at both national and international levels, which is the key to an effective response to modern challenges in the field of legal protection of intellectual property.
In turn, Olesia Otradnova, Director of the Prosecutor`s Training Center of Ukraine, and her Deputy Andrii Orlean, spoke about the current activities of the institution, including international cooperation and the development of new tools for prosecutor training, expressing a clear interest in involving the IP Office in developing training content related to the protection of IP rights.
The outcomes of the trilateral meeting included agreements on the following:
In addition, the possibility of conducting such initiatives was discussed to enhance inter-institutional cooperation:
Read also:
No Comments